tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22760090021090511412024-02-22T00:51:48.386-08:00Kashyap DeepakResearch Scholar, English, SLL-CS, JNU, New Delhi, India- 110067Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-49574424995227567162017-09-20T23:10:00.000-07:002017-09-20T23:13:25.222-07:00The JNUSU, A String-Puppet of JNUTA<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Who could forget the Kaleidoscope, the time pass of one’s younger age, immature and wildly free life called childhood? It was replaced with the string-puppet show, popularly known as the game of Kathputali, with the passage of time. It is a strange game in which actors are attached to some strings while performing their action with hands, or arms. A puppeteer, in the background, control the strings which give motion to the body, eyes, mouth, head, limbs, and action of a character. Though he speaks in the voice of the on-stage character yet, the audience is forced to believe that these words are of the character. However, the reality is far away from the “accepted truth.” Neither actor nor action, rather it is the person behind the scene that does everything on behalf of the player.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">This puppet in JNU is none other than the JNUSU, whose strings, at least from last two years, are in the hands of JNUTA. The Student Union, whether by will or force, is at lip-service of their masters who are controlling their actions. Meanwhile, and in between the times, the JNUites are compelled to believe that the JNUSU is doing everything for their shake. There is nothing for the students until JNUTA is leading this organisation.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The JNUSU has lost its respect in the current form due to their alignment with the JNUTA. The need of the hour is to disassociate JNUSU from the powerful lobby of JNUTA. The former are undeveloped while the later are riped intellectuals, who know how to misguide the weak minds.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Each student fails to understand, why and for which motif the JNUSU is in secret engagement with JNUTA. Today, both the associations come today on the matter of GSCASH, which is a serious issue that should be taken care and if possible with grave concern. I am not big enough to talk about such matters. So, I am not pressing many alphabets of my laptop on same. But, my concern will not forget to highlight JNUSU and its relation with JNUTA.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">On GSCASH, as many pamphlets are saying, this is right too, that the boy students harass many girl students. No doubt in the above statement but, is it the whole truth? Is there anything left? Is it only the students? Are teachers not in the list of those who “harassed” the girl students? If yes, then why the JNUSU is not mentioning it in their pamphlets. It seems that all the left parties, right wing, and even BAPSA have accepted the fact that only “boy’ do the act of harassment? Why are they not pointing their fingers on teachers of JNU? Why are they not included, or, why they left alone by these student unions. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">A student union should be for the benefit of the student and not for the JNUTA. The student wing should come out to send a message that not only boys but the teachers are also part of it. A half-truth or half statement will be an injustice to girls, and same is not the motif of Gender Justice.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Today, everyone is crying in JNU about this hot topic but have they ever thought how the JNUTA is leading a student representative body in India’s most influential university. The JNUSU is the “Parrot,” if not tarot card, of the Madame Sosostris, the famous clairvoyante.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Note: If you do not like the matter, enjoy the String-Puppet show (copied from YouTube)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGOJMQC7Jy4&t=70s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGOJMQC7Jy4&t=70s</a></span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-34697514568975250262017-09-14T09:29:00.001-07:002017-09-14T09:41:13.164-07:00Deconstruction of BAPSA’s Pamphlet<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>Deconstruction of BAPSA’s Pamphlet: A Footnote to Dinesh Kumar </b><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">It is Sep 6, evening. Voting for JNUSU election was to begin in less than twelve hours. A “philosopher friend” of mine named Dinesh Kumar come to my room. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">“Whom you are going to vote,” he questioned. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">“It could be a female from AISF,” I replied with adding that, “I am also thinking about BAPSA.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">“If I were at your position, then I will vote for BAPSA,” said Dinesh by putting his hand on his head in an advising manner. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">I understand the hidden meaning what he was trying to suggest me. Today, two weeks later, he comes with a note “Interrogating BAPSA’s Ideology: Follow the principle of No Hindu Chauvinism, No More Minority Fundamentalism.” <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">After reading read his words, I decide to write something on this pamphlet. My arguments in this note is purely based on an essay “Politics and the English Language” by George Orwell. Some of my sentences also have an indirect resembles with Jacques Derrida’s “Deconstruction” in which he stated the relationship between “text” and “meaning.” Before going deep on the subject, let me quote the words of BAPSA’s Pamphlet with which my friend Dinesh has "objection":<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>Oppression through Egalitarian Religions and Philosophies</b></span></span></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Religions like Buddhism, Islam, Christianity and many others have played a significant role in spreading the ideas of equality and humanity at a particular point of its historical development, and they still continue to inculcate humanitarian values for many. Buddha was always against violence and Buddhism is all about compassion and fellow feeling. However it has always lost its egalitarian transformative values once the socially dominant oppressive forces appropriated it for their own interest, producing a larger cultural hegemony for a more stable power structure. The same happened even with a non-spiritual, non-religious egalitarian philosophy like Marxism that produced social Fascism in USSR and China under ‘communist’ or ‘proletariat’ dictatorship. The oppressive forces with the help of state machinery produce, reproduce and regulate regressive social values, inequalities through socially dominant cultures. In such condition a transformative ideal can become a dogma, fanatic and oppressive. Further under a democratic electoral system, the oppressive forces always try to convert political majority into a communal majority through the dominant culture, posing a serious threat to the entire humanity or democracy itself. Therefore this is high time for the oppressed from all faith, all countries, to support each other by isolating the common enemies within.</span></span></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Here is my deconstruction of the text, meaning, language and its effect on the careful person.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>The first</b> line, “have played significant role(s) in spreading the ideas of equality and humanity” is itself a lie as all the religions, except a few, are promoting more hatred and bloodshed against a different community. Christian hates Jew, Hindu hates Muslim, Shia hates Sunni and many others. So “the ideas of equality and humanity” dies a premature death in the embryo of religion long before it was born. Yes, I forget to mention, "Left" hate "ABVP" so the "BAPSA."<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>The second line</b>: no objection on the second line.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>The third line</b> is most problematic as it stated that Buddhism “lost its egalitarian transformative values once the socially dominant oppressive forces appropriated it for their own interest?” No doubt, when religion mixed with politics, it becomes polluted.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>The fourth line</b> remains the biggest hurdle and becomes totally undigested when you compare Buddhism with fascism especially “with a non-spiritual, non-religious egalitarian philosophy like Marxism.” The gap was further widened by making it a synonymous of “social Fascism in USSR and China.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The language by the writer is unstructured in third and fourth line. The writer has to quote Marxism first and then Buddhism in the context. If this was employed then. the problem remains even less. By using this, one can say that Buddhism is wrong as it is walking on the path of Fascism. But, your meaning is totally opposite. This line with fouth line means that Buddhism is Fascist and rest of the ideologies are its “tail.” And its “head” is Buddhism. By Buddhism, I mean the corrupted Buddhism under the influence of politics, or the bad politics.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Following the essay of Orwell, till four lines, the language is highly Socialist and Marxist. It can be proved by the excessive use of words like “humanitarian values,” “egalitarian transformative values,” “socially dominant oppressive forces,” “cultural hegemony” and “more stable power structure,” “Marxism,” “social Fascism,” ‘communist’ or ‘proletariat’ dictatorship. Here, one like Dinesh could easily interrogate BAPSA with the words “Are you promoting Ambedkarism or Socialism?” If you follow the footprints of Ambedkar, then it was not the language of this “icon” who believed in more democratic and constitutional language. Whether it is Marxists or socialists, they always discredit State and religion. But, name me even a single Socialist country that is able to disband religion from its land. I assure that your answer is negative. Ambedkar believed in “state” and wanted to eradicate all evils by living in the structure (one can interrogate me here on the point of his conversion to Buddhism). It is his belief that leads us to the Constitution.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">I recommend you to use original Ambedkarite Language that is solely based on the Constitution. If possible, avoid the words “fascist,” “proletariat,” “dictatorship” or the traditional Marxist terminology. You fight is also against Socialism who never support you in your struggle. And your using of their language, surely giving strength to them instead of you. On a different note, if I ask you a question, “what is the difference between your structural language and the language used by the Socialists,” then what would be your answer. My dear friends, Ambedkar is behind the picture. Bring him on the stage.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>The fifth line</b> is correct, but again what is the content of it. “The oppressive forces” “state machinery” stands for which ideology. Even, socialist countries too “oppressive forces with the help of state machinery produce, reproduce and regulate regressive social values, inequalities through socially dominant cultures.” For example China. If so, then how would you justify your words by using the socialist diction.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>Sixth</b>: I am accepting it correct. So, no argument on it.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>The seventh line</b> is even wrong. Each “political majority” is a “communal majority.” Donald Trump did it in the USA, but everything is subtle in the USA. In fact, it is a communist propaganda. However, the question, does or not the majority have rights? Did they ever stop any advancement of society? If they had stopped, there would never be gender justice in the society. Today they are losing power. “They” means majority as well as elite “socialists” and “Marxists.” Hence, they are dividing people in “majority” and “minority.” Disassociate from such “Comrades” (Finally, I started to exploit the Socialist diction. In fact, Orwell teaches this to me. If someone is interested in knowing then reading the ending of “Politics and the English Language”)<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The pamphlet has a <b>final line</b>, “Therefore this is high time for the oppressed from all faith, all countries, to support each other by isolating the common enemies within.” It reminds me of the ending of “The Communist Manifesto” which reads “workers of the world unite.” <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">But, whether it is Marx or BAPSA or even Socialist-cum-Marxist, everyone failed to tell “how to unite.” “From where to start and where to end?” Is there anyone who can tell. Marx wanted to “unite” in the absence of religion, but it is the irony of the situation is that even his name “KARL MARX” was given by religion. Why did not he change his name? It shows his religious temper, what if it is behind the scene. It is the reason, William Shakespeare writes, “What is in a name?”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Now, I simply ask,</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">What is the difference between the “language” of BAPSA and LEFT?</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">What is the difference between the “ideology” LEFT and BAPSA?</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Is it promoting Idea of Ambedkar or Marx?</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Is BAPSA a group of Neo-Socialists, (as ABVP claimed in their election pamphlet).</span></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Being a student of JNU, I have a special respect for BAPSA for their struggle and hard work. If they delink from the socialist diction, terminology and even ideology, then it could surely promote and secure the vision of Ambedkar.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">There are two types of people in this world. One is Foolish, and another is intelligent. Everyone likes to be in the company of Intelligent. But, a "fool" is full of ideas that are logical, scientific and even ration but intellectual do not like to talk to them. “They are dirt,” for the intellectuals. It is this notion of intelligent towards “fool” which makes them “Outsider.” Dinesh is Outsider. I am Neo-Outsider.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">A final note is: do the critique in "language" of Ambedkar, and if possible "avoid to brand" me in socialist style.</span></span><span style="line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-24922478965694733972017-09-11T02:18:00.002-07:002017-09-11T02:23:45.991-07:00Victory, Celebration, and sense of Corruption in Post Election JNU<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><b>Victory, Celebration, and sense of Corruption in Post Election JNU</b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The election is over after securing a victory of Left Alliance. After tasting Laddu in Periyar Hostel on Sunday, I bring some facts and details that are reverse to what is said and promised during the election.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Scenario 1<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The student community of JNU is told that JNUSU is out of Fund. So, when the JNUSU office bearers were fined by the Administration, which they called Sanghi, they were collecting money from the students. Who will not get angry after knowing that fact that students do not have money to pay the fine. This fine force them to "bag" money from the students. The only cry was "the VC is Sanghi." And the LEFT had left no stone unturned to prove it right.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Here, three points need attention:<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">1. JNUSU is out of Fund<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">2. Office bearers were collecting money from Students<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">3. The VC is Sanghi.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Without giving much resistance, let us accept all these points.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Scenario 2<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Whether it is JNU VC or the BJP Government, the LEFT of JNU regularly interrogates them on the ground of morality and Corruption. The frequently asked questions are "what happened to the Black Money" and "Where is my 15 LAC"</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Here is I am accepting them and their statements true.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Scenario 3<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">After the election, some 400 Laddus were distributed in Periyar Hostel Mess. The mess manager approved this by saying that "it was from AISA for the victory of Election." I think, he forgets to mention two other groups here. Let us discuss it.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">When I check the price, I found it is around 3000 </span>rs<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">. If the same scene is in all hostels then the amount is around 60,000 Indian Rupees.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">My question is <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">1. From where the money come?<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">2. If JNUSU has no fund then who sponsored these Laddus?</span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The Unity could simply say that they have collected this money from the students. If you are coming with the same answer then, how much money is collected by JNUSU office bearers for paying the money as a penalty to JNU Admin? How many days were taken by you to collect that money? </span></div>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, sans-serif;">What I Think:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Dear LEFT, I have to ask you, <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">1. Is this money a black money? <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">2. Is spending some 60,000 is not a corruption? <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">3. When you tell from where it comes?<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">4. Why is this money not spent to purchase books for students?<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">5. Why is this money not denoted to Najib's Family who is fighting case alone?<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">6. Are you too corrupt like BJP?<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">7. Is JNUSU out of the fund was a lie?<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">8. If you can spend 60,000 on Sweets, then why you collected money from students to pay your penalty?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Conclusion:<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">When you criticize BJP on various grounds, they never answer you. You pretend to raise the issues, so JNU students take you correctly. If JNU students are not wrong, then I hope I will get answers to all my questions.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">However, you are free to not to answer me. Following your traditions, BJP did not answer you, so BJP is wrong. In the same line, if you do not answer me, then you are wrong.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background: white; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Come forward and answer with courage dear president Geeta Kumari.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-63577441361017808682017-09-09T22:41:00.001-07:002017-09-09T22:41:06.673-07:00Redness Prevails in JNU <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Three layers come together to defend the dying for of JNU in the student election. The efforts were successful and ended in victory with pomp and celebration, hallelujah.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Slogan raised high with the words, "JNU was Red, is Red and will remain Red." But, the question is till when? Let us not discuss it as it is not the mature time to stumble on the question.</span></div>
<div class="text_exposed_show" style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; display: inline;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><div style="margin-bottom: 6px; text-align: justify;">
Redness of red is my target. The dark blood-like colour of Russian revolution become thicker than the water in JNU. One could hardly distinguished water from the blood. Two parties, ABVP and BAPSA, from a different type of politics and ideology are enough to shake the Revolutionaries of LEFT.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
I afraid whether the JNU LEFT aware about the meaning of Revolution. It in simple words means a new beginning when old ideologies die and are replaced by the new one. The powerful did their best to stop them, sometimes they spread propaganda and come together and tied themselves in one relation. They are afraid of change and want to keep the old structure of society by preferring the Old arrangement of Power. Such is the picture of Left in JNU.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
Stay in powerful remains their final aim, and for they are ready to even to engage with the older "enemy." By this type of affair, I assure one thing, the left undoubtedly win but the colour of their REDNESS becomes thick and they know it very well. In the next election, the fourth remaining group surely will be added in the LEAGUE OF LEFT.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
My politics always remains politics of moral and ethics that is beneficial for the masses and not for the political party or ideology. Democracy demands the shunning of ideology for the masses, who are party's first priority. Those who favour party or ideology (whether Left, ABVP, NSUI, BASO, or BAPSA) they are the product of moral corruption.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
If the politics of LEFT is not politics of moral and ethics, they are cannot represent me. I do not want an alliance to secure a victory. In a democracy, everyone has an equal right to participate in the election. The alliance is nothing but a hurdle that exploits one's constitutional right.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
My hypothesis is, </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
1. What is the difference in Capitalism and Left on JNU?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
2. What is the difference between idealism and ideal?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
3. Is this how Left demands revolution?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
4. Is this not exploitation of Rights, the Fundamental Rights?</div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
Footnote: Redness is fading with each election.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF92mkWK7zrBTajHrSke7515LpYwlBljaf6fqSXeQtkJhcEyKYBmVZUmSxoikmGPjDhaQPzejWvKVRvfrP5nkSrWb37jTKH-IOB6atxESAdKSXlObO44IgmuZbQR4XR9gwMPYLcIeMpx0/s1600/Red.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="960" data-original-width="958" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF92mkWK7zrBTajHrSke7515LpYwlBljaf6fqSXeQtkJhcEyKYBmVZUmSxoikmGPjDhaQPzejWvKVRvfrP5nkSrWb37jTKH-IOB6atxESAdKSXlObO44IgmuZbQR4XR9gwMPYLcIeMpx0/s320/Red.jpg" width="318" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-37486682494333492782017-09-07T06:09:00.001-07:002017-09-07T06:12:40.980-07:00Blurred Vision of JNUSU Presidential Debate<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b><span style="color: #1d2129;">Link: <a href="http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/09/07/blurred-vision-jnusu-presidential-debate/">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/09/07/blurred-vision-jnusu-presidential-debate/</a></span></b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>Blurred Vision of JNUSU Presidential Debate: </b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>A First Person Review for the post of PRESIDENT of JNUSU</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">Surrounded by some 3,000 students, it is nearly terrible for some to speak from the podium or the </span><span style="color: #1d2129;">dais</span><span style="color: #1d2129;">, as called by the EC of JNUSU. Only six candidates successfully deliver their promised speech. My account will not be a past narration that recollects the words, phrases, or mock manner of the candidates rather I focus on how their speech had influenced the JNUSU students in general, and myself in particular.</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">NSUI</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The candidate announces that she is not well, so I will not explore much and accept her words as true. By doing this I am giving her sixth position in my tally of ranks.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">AISA-SFI-DSF</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">A very nice person, and highly active in JNU student politics, Geeta Kumari was the most experienced candidate in JNUSU election after Aprajita Raja. In her speech, I was thinking whether she was contesting for the post of MLA or JNUSU? Does she know what she was saying? When ABVP and others started to hoot, she clearly lost her confidence, senses and even stopped her speech. Hooting in your case was not even ten percent--if compared to Tripathi’s speech. She penetrates like a tiger where you shows your weakness and skills of an orator of low order. Your speech brings you to the fifth position.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">BAPSA</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">As expected, she, Sabana Ali, brings real issues and explains most of them. However, her lack of confidence and less skilled orator may mar her success. She could, as her previous speeches show, could do much better but, she failed. However, her position is still much better than the others candidates. Her speech is of the fourth order.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">AISF</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">She is smart, intelligent and one who chooses her words very carefully. The intellectual speech, full of national and international issues attached to domestic problems that establish her excellence in the field of politics. Who knows what will be the result of the election, but, for sure, I can sense a more mature future of this coming leader. She will be one day, one of the most successful leaders of India. I become a fan of her balanced speech. If she failed to be a leader, then she will be an esteemed professor. That person is best professional for the post, but let us see what other voters think about you.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">ABVP</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">My expected fear that no one will allow her to speak become true as other parties hooted during the speech of ABVP candidate. They are showing that she is "Outsider." However, her self-confidence and the flow of the speech was enough to clean the dust from the mirror of LEFT and BAPSA. Such a nice speaker with the sweet and enchanting voice that disturb the mind of the opponent. Even stronger was her delivery of sentences that clearly hit the target and makes a hole in the heart of left. She surely deserves the second position in my estimate.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Farooque Alam </b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Now, I open my account with the sensation, the favourite, who proved to a nightmare for the Left Alliance. Faruq, the bulldozer, is the name attributed to him. He came like a person from nothing, or from the lowest dregs of humanity only to show the mirror of reality to the LEFT, RIGHT, BAPSA, ex. JNUSU President and all other “thekedars” of JNU. The parties who earlier denied his existence are unable to sleep the whole night out of the fear of coming ghost of defeat. If some person deserves 10 marks out of 10 then this is the person and he is, in my eyes, is the first in the position of speaker.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">What I suspect:</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">Independent could attract some 200+ more votes and his total may reach around 400-500</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">AISF will be near 400-500 (if there is difference in her party, then around 200-300)</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">NSUI candidate somewhere between 120 to 150</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">Alliance = 800=> (reason is the growing strength of Independent and AISF)</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">In my estimate, the fight is between BAPSA and ABVP. </span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background: white; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">UDSF and SIO have already offered their support to BAPSA. Though, their support is just a moral boosting and BAPSA needs it. The loss of LEFT and gaining of Faruq would be the benefit for BAPSA. Hence, they have a fair chance of winning.</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #1d2129;">If ABVP is able to manage their previous record of votes then they are the winner else BAPSA wins the presidential seat.</span><span style="color: #1d2129;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">NOTE: This estimate is only for the post of PRESIDENT of JNUSU</span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-42442326360148751202017-09-03T20:43:00.001-07:002017-09-03T20:45:26.583-07:00"Advertisement" Grades of JNUSU Election<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The strongness and weakness a political affiliation is checked on the parameters that how it sponsors its party and candidates. I ventured to recognize this by having a look on posters, pamphlets, rely-pamphlets, speeches, marches, pre-GBM, unity and outside support. Here, is my estimation about all parties participating in JNUSU election, 2017. Final result is below the post.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">BAPSA</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The above determinants are active in BAPSA. The party's Facebook "poster war" that is directed against the LEFT is unchallengeable and unanswerable. Pamphlets having critical quality and directed to the subject. Rallies, replies, and marches are enough to prove their rising strength as a threat to all.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">ABVP</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The party seems very strong in this election and has a fair chance of winning the post of president. Its pamphlets are amazingly amazing and exposed all the hidden branches of LEFT, and BAPSA--the main target of ABVP. No, one can defeat it in pamphlets and no one has guts to answer them. Who knows when their "UNITY MARCH" will come but, it is the strongness of ABVP and BAPSA that forced the left to constitute a weak group of AISA-SFI-DSF. But, I find the "main" candidate missing from the ground level. And only some workers, very hardworking, are there to promote the party and vision. Still, I will declare the promotion half, if the Presidential candidate failed to show presence among students. Do come out, else a good chance of winning will go in the dustbin. You cannot win the battle only by the speech on Aug 6. Talk to the students, is my advice.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">NSUI</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">It is behind on all factors, except one of its candidate reserve special mention-he was my student for some time. But, I avoid to name him. On the case of Najib, the missing student till now, he exposed the left's stand by stating how he stands for truth. But, in case of the advertisement, the party is too far to be called a party.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">AISF</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">It is fighting on fewer seats so some intellectuals are predicting that the presidential candidate could magnetize voters of left. Other fears that this candidate could distract South Votes as well as the Dalit votes. According to some rumors, the loophole is that this candidate is not promoting and absence is "visible." Some weak points are here: 1) either this candidate is sure of his/her victory; 2) it has already accepted defeat; 3) it did not want to come out in open. However, the reasons are not clear. I failed to understand, why they participate if things have to in this way. We need more participation and come under the sky and raise your slogan. Pople wants to hear your voice. be a representative and not "Missing." Whenever this party defends some leftist element, BAPSA comes out with the roar and answer its query on the same day. How fast is BAPSA? Just, directed your pamphlets against BAPSA not LEFT.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Independent Candidate</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">This person is hard working, extremely hard working if compared to other candidates, especially with of ABVP and AISF. Can easily be seen in Dhaba(s) and everywhere but pamphlets are missing. Lack of strategy is also missing but still, this candidate is brave, like a tiger. He at least has the courage to be among the "powerful."</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">AISA-SFI-DSF</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">POWERHOUSE on ground and unity doubled its power and threefold comrades are main power and girl candidate redoubled its strength. Apart from the seat of President, all three posts are entirely of the LEFT and congratulations to them in advance. But, be the biggest party, it is my duty to be cruel to its criticism. The main aim is only to hold "power' which is slipping from their hands. Like others, the speech of candidate has nothing to do with JNU. It is Election of JNUSU not for the post of MLA and MP. Where are common students and their issues? It regularly failed in answering the "Pamphlets" distributed by ABVP and BAPSA. The poster war is missing, and it seems its fighting is only with ABVP, and the question of JNU is Missing. Thriplete workers are nothing to the hard work if compared to ABVP and BAPSA sympathizers. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Result;</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Position.......... Party ........................ Grades</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">First .............. BAPSA ...................... AP</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Second:.......... ABVP ........................ AM</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Third:............. AISA-SFI-DSF ............ BO</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Fourth:........... Independent: ............. BM</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Fifth:.............. AISF-......................... Fail</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Sixth:............. NSUI.......................... Fail</span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-61384220545897808542017-08-29T02:29:00.000-07:002017-08-29T07:51:47.605-07:00Ram-Rahim, “Justice” and the Politics of JNU<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<b><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Link: </span></b><span style="font-family: verdana, sans-serif;"><b><a href="http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/08/29/courts-judgementjusticeand-politics-jnuideological-fissures/">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/08/29/courts-judgementjusticeand-politics-jnuideological-fissures/</a></b></span><br />
<b><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Court’s Judgement, “Justice” and the Politics of JNU: Ideological Fissures </span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">We live in a secular country, if not a religious, that has given birth to Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Din-e-Ilahi. And, if the news reports are not wrong, one more, “<i>Lingayat</i>,” is about to born. Whatever be the religion of one, s/he at the time of their birth are religious, in one way or other. But today, everyone forgets, what is a religion? The chapter of this transition was written in 1950. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">By adopting the written Constitution, the notion of old religious thought had died and a new one called democracy, though weak yet strong, come into existence. Comparatively, the weakest is the politics, and the most potent form of it is the Judiciary. It most substantial existence is proved in August 2017 with two judgments that changed the way one thinks: Progressive opinion on Triple Talaq and the sordid chapter of Ram Rahim</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> With these rulings, the whole of India in general and the JNU, in particular, is divided into two fronts—one against another with added hatred. It seems the intellectuals, by wish or force, become the protector or destroyer of some idea: whether it is Triple Talaq or the case of so called saint. If one looks closely, the JNU student wing is not criticising the idea, but disrespecting “religion,” whether Hindu or Islam, by hateful comments.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">When the judgment on Triple Talaq came, the Left side of JNU was hiding its face, and who knows where. Similarly, the result of Ram Rahim makes the Right Wing invisible. Is it a joke to blame the religion of others? Its answer is partly yes, and partly no—if the question is asked in concern of JNU, the nest of future intellectuals who, in the real sense of the word, are no intellectual at all. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">These intellectuals are foot soldiers, in the guise of student wing parties, who work more on Facebook and less on the ground and even less on papers, I mean academic. They believe in a hit and run theory—just criticize and abuse the religion through pamphlets or Facebook status. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">About religion, no one, not even these rightist or leftist, are aware of the direction they are going. Instead of defining how these spiritual gurus and <i>ulemas</i> become a self-state, an uncrowned king who runs a parallel government of its kind, they are criticising the politics in general and religion in particular. From the ages, religion is preferred over politics, don’t you know. If you look historically too, faith comes first, and rest of the options are optional. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Undoubtedly, the story of Ram Rahim is enough to fade any Bollywood movie. It would be an added surprise that a <i>saint</i> has enough power to control the politics of the state, if not the country. By examining the previous case of some saints like Aasharam, Rampal, and others, one finds that these are now behind bars for their crimes. But, this is not enough, as it has another hidden and unmentioned angle. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Sakshi Maharaj, an MP, and Syed Ahmed Bukhari, the Shahi Imam, are some controversial but religious figures that too needed attention. They deserve the same place next to these <i>saints</i>, and as soon as possible else it would be too late. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">But, instead of a quick action, we believe in late by preferring the slow pace of judgments by the court. The intellectuals of JNU never take a criminal as a criminal until s/he was declared same by the tribunal. Think about Sakshi Maharaj and Syed Ahmed Bukhari. Should they be highlighted along with Babas but, in JNU, one is selected over the other. This great university, talk about Sakhshi Maharaj but forget Bukhari. Why is JNU so selective by not talking to other? Where are those revolutionaries of Left, Right, Centre, BAPSA, Collective, Hundred Flowers Group, the GSCASH, feminists and all other whose name is not here? Silence prevails. It could shake their vote bank.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The JNU student parties escape from their responsibilities, how these holy saints become a power station. But, I will go on to do their job: first, try to find those gap and then attempted to seal it with the concrete and cement.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The power of religious saint is the mass following, which is often uneducated, poor, simple minded and even devotee of the first order. They are attracted under the greed of food and good condition of living, and even the health sanitation. They are given so much privileged that if one works the whole day, then that person, male or female, will not be able to get the same type of hygienic conditions of living given by the Babas. From here, the treacheries, misguiding are shaped, and these innocent people are used as a human shield to hide their sin. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Ram Rahim is neither the first and nor the last of this chain, thousands more to come and from which religion who knows. The mistakes are of ours, and we have to accept these sooner rather than later. We protect them and put them in the highest position of religion that is purely unchallengeable. It's perfect and living example is Sahi Imam of Jama Masjid, who, from last ten years, cannot arrest despite his non-bailable warrants. Like Ram Rahim, he too gave mutual support to various political parties but no talk about him. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Why the silence prevails in case of Imam. Who knows what would be the fate of Syed Ahmed Bukhari, Sakshi Maharaj, and Ramdev. In a question to, why there is no spotlight on them? My answer is, they are not arrested and convicted by the police, hence, no spotlight. In this sense, they are innocent for their the masses, Hindu or Muslim does not matter. In fact, it is fear of loss of vote bank rather than fear of religion for the government.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Crime is a crime, and criminal is criminal, this is the lesson religion taught us but, we have forgotten it completely. We just try to prove, the religion of other is not right as compared to ours. Naturally, JNU is divided into “us” and “they.” It seems, a cold war of religion is going on, but no one holds responsible oneself for it and blames it on others. Let me tell you, how it works.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">An unpopular, not popular, author in the twentieth century says, “Justice is a sister of popularity.” When a popular-cum-powerful person, having a reputation of a high order, is convicted by the Court of Law is considered as “justice.” </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Before the judgment, a socio-political critic, not even by the single stretch of the imagination, have the guts to criticise that accuse like Ram Rahim. For example, let me remind you, there exists in “no headlines” on Aug 22, but suddenly, the saint received the media attention, national as well as International. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">By defining about him in length would be to waste my words on unnecessary narrative. But, as a footnote to Baba, I would say, such is also applicable to Syed Ahmed Bukhari, the Shahi Imam. Ram Rahim is famous and convicted by the court; Imam is too popular but not convicted. Thus, due to the absence of the second form of justice, justice remains incomplete. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">According to this, the case of Baba is “justice,” but, dear followers of students wings from JNU, what about Imam. Similarly, until and unless, the court does not convict imam, he will remain in the position and enjoy all the privileges—like Ram Rahim. But despite knowing all the facts, no, JNU party will come out in the open. If they do, then it, by the mere fact, could be a chance to set equilibrium in Justice. But, they needed the vote. So, why I am crying for justice, which already died long before I was born.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Herein, my focus point is not Imam but the way these spiritual gurus hold position, legally or illegally does not matter. But, they are powerful enough that they can wither away the state. Asharam, Ram Rahim, Rampal, Ram Rahim and Imam and others create a problem for the country. They, in simple wording, believe neither in Supreme Court, not in Democracy or the Constitution. Their only belief is a religion, but it is not the religion that is written in holy books. Instead, they created a new definition by their own and forced it on the innocent people. My question, why the JNUiets are wordless when the issue of different religion and ideology confronted us. Moral bankruptcy it is.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">In fact, religion is a shade of protection and well as a vote bank. Who could forget the 13-year-old Jain girl who dies in Hyderabad in 2016 after “Fasting” for 68 days? The issue was sensitive as religion involved in it, and it is even more sensitive when a minority group comes in picture. I do not know about goodness and badness of that Jain festival. But, religion, as used by the Jain community, should not be utilized in the way, it was used. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">We should check each religious matter according to the constitution as well as per the needs of the twentieth century. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Babas and Imam were at the better position before Independence, but today they are corrupted to the last edge of the stick. There is no need for their post. Hence, all must be dismantled soon, if not with immediate effect.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">We lived in a religious country, but we forget even the definition of religion—it is for the people, but people are not for it. It is awful for the powerful judiciary when the people, whether related to Triple talaq or Ram Rahim verdict, disrespect its judgment by preferring the religion, which is itself unwritten. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Think for a while, whether it is Prophet Muhammad or Lord Ram both are born as a human of flesh and blood. They were, for the promotion of peace and spreading of harmony among the masses, but we, the Indians of today just believe in hate. The defeat the different religion only by hate becomes our motto. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Each religious Guru or Imam wants to be powerful, and he uses the way he likes to attain it, including violence. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Do we forget the partition, a dirty chapter of the Indian history? In a question to “how many gurus and Imam were killed in that brutal violence” the answer would surely be “a few” but, the local people were, “unnumbered.” </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">All happened because of Gurus and Imam, the protector of religion. Apply the same here. The followers of Ram Rahim got killed, but Baba survives and one day will be roaming free like the birds in the sky. Rethink that the masses are their cannon fodder, and they kill us for their “sport.” In fact, we fight for their cause and life. If they have to live, we, the actual soldiers of religion or the ideology, have to sacrifice our life. Reapply this in case of Imam. Wake, arise or be forever fallen. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">But, why to do this. It is the kitchen in which we cook our food, so called vote bank. The parties won the battle only by showing the fear of one religion to other.</span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-78925535196653339742017-08-24T08:56:00.000-07:002017-08-25T00:06:04.893-07:00The JNUTA of JNU<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<b><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Link: </span></b><span style="font-family: verdana, sans-serif;"><b><a href="http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/08/24/jnuta-jnu-deconstructing-jnu-admission-student-jnuta/">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/08/24/jnuta-jnu-deconstructing-jnu-admission-student-jnuta/</a></b></span><br />
<b><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Deconstructing JNU, Admission, Student, and the JNUTA</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">It is said, and wisely too, that if you are not paying for some product, then you are the product. By building the argument around this line, I will discuss the case of JNU, Admission, Student, and JNUTA. The student metaphorically becomes a product in JNUTA’s resistance, if not the revolution, against the administration. The students are employed as the “foot soldiers” by these professors, from Left or Right does not matter. The students, on the contrary, are nothing more than blind followers of their master’s order. Their wit and consciousness are faded against the dark enlightenment of these well-versed professors. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The second summer is near to pass in the same mode of destructive argument by these professors against the admissions for the year 2017. The students, on the opposite side, do not have the courage to check the authenticity of words that are spoken by the professors. In the lack of this authenticity, the students, to talk in the socialist language, become “cog in their wheel” that is used to gain profit, not for the sake of students but the professors. Under the blanket of student’s support, the teachers hide their mistakes, if not the guilt or to say, moral sin. This must be exposed in the same way the teachers revealed the JNU “Research Admission 2017-18.” The exposure is published on web page <a href="https://jnuta.wordpress.com/">https://jnuta.wordpress.com</a> that mentions “Only 53% of intake offered for admissions, and total collapse of reservations!” (Aug 4, 2017).</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The astute morality and “playing down news theory” is exercised by the professors to misguide the student community regarding the less admission policy. The whole blame put on the shoulders of JNU administration, especially the VC, the first and foremost enemy of JNUTA. The allegations, charges, marches, hunger strikes and slogans created an atmosphere of chaos that most of the students failed to understand. I would not spend my time in proving the professors wrong and accept all their published words as “true.” </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">But, the allegations charged here by the JNUTA are severe and thus must be examined deeply and with equal concern, and even honesty. If JNUTA and its associates are right, then I would like to pose some questions if they like to answer:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: left;">
</div>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Who checks the exam? Is it administration or the professors? The answer, professors.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Who graded papers? Is it administration or the professors? The answer, professors.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Who finalizes the merit list? Is it administration or the professors? The answer, professors.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Who interviewed the students? Is it administration or the professors? The answer, professors.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Who finalized the “final list”? Is it administration or the professors? The answer, professors.</span></li>
</ol>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">I hope the answer to five questions will be right. But, I suspect, if the teachers of JNU were given the task to check these question, then my result would be “FAIL.” Or, to write in the language of administration, “not qualified.” </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">When the professors are responsible for everything related to result, then why the tables are turned towards the management in general and the VC in particular. It is only the teachers who check, marks, grades and even finalizes the merit list. But, it is the height of moral corruption that the VC is responsible for the difference between “Intake” and “offer” seats. Is it not hypocrisy? Just compare the data made available by the JNUTA, how many students appeared in the exam and how many are qualified. To tell the truth, these seats remained unfulfilled because of these professors so called vanguard of JNU, who gave fewer marks to students. And now, when there are fewer students in the admission, they are shedding the tears of a crocodile.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">If the professors are so concerned about the students, then why did not they upgrade the grades? For example, in the Russian department, as shown by the JNUTA data, a total 13 students have appeared. To increase the number of students, the professors should have passed all the students. Wait, I am blocking the way of working of teachers, or, I am telling them how to work. In fact, these teachers believe in an old phrase, “do not teach fathers’ have to make babies.” Under the hallucination of that addiction, they forget what is right for the students as well as for the University to which they claim “the best university.”</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">On Aug 24 again, the JNUTA issued a “Statement: On the JNU administration’s 17 August circular on the intake.” The fourth point of the statement runs thus: </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 6pt 36pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">“The JNUTA does not accept supervision caps for faculty based on rank.”</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The statement is even funny, if not contradictory or useful for the students. It is again beneficial for the professors instead of the students. Again, the demands of JNUTA should be questioned on the ground of: </span><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: left;">
</div>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">If JNUTA wants no cap for the different post of teachers, then why they need different salaries. The responsibility of a Professor is more than an Associate professor and Assistant Professor. Hence, there is the difference in the number of students.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">There is another side of this non-cap trap that is demanded by JNUTA. A large chunk of Professors, only the professors, engaged in various national and international projects, an additional source of income. If they were given more students, then working for students may affect their future projects. They consider their time more important than the students (MPhil/PhDs). Hence, a cap is essential to the Professors so that they remained responsible and accountable for the students. </span></li>
</ol>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">In fact, these teachers will never take any moral responsibility for the failures of their duties and responsibilities. Rather, they believe in the blame game and throw their problems on others, especially the VC. It is similar like, America is responsible for the issue of Arab World. All attacks in India are sponsored by Pakistan only (focus on the word “only” and not Pakistan). Similarly, the JNU is degraded because of the VC. Thus, their most famous slogan is, this VC is humiliating the students by reducing the intake. Remember dear professors, you are also equally also responsible for the doom of this university. By beating the drum of resistance, you cannot clean your moral sins that are committed against the student community in last one year.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">In a blame game, if one wants to save oneself, then other is projected as the enemy. In the politics of blame game, one has to find a common enemy, and that is the VC, that quite regularly named as <i>Sanghi</i>-VC. Once one decided who the enemy is, then one has to hammer hard that enemy through one’s critical stones. All is done to save one from the wrath of critique. It is similar like that of the partition of India. Both, Hindu and Muslim massacred each other, but the British took a safe passage towards England. Similar again, Hitler is an enemy as he killed millions of Jews in a Concentration Camp, but Henry S. Truman who ordered to drop the Nuclear Bomb on Japan is a promoter of peace. One forgets, both killed human but on different land, time and place. In fact, it is a game on popular demand. And in popularity, the JNUTA sees the <i>Sangh</i> as the enemy. So, it attempted, and successfully too, to paint the VC in the <i>Bhagwa</i> colour. However, by doing this, it is explicitly rejecting what it had done to the students in the previous session. This is JNU of today in case of registration only. It is just a pseudo-fight in the name of rights but for whom? Who will take the moral responsibility?</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 6pt; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The foot soldiers will never question the professors, that reduced them nearer to the neo-modern slave, the victim of destiny.</span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-1080375554937121912017-08-20T10:29:00.000-07:002017-08-24T08:32:06.698-07:00The Flood: A Business<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><b>Link: <a href="http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/08/20/indian-government-state-mafia-media-unsolved-riddle-flood-business/">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/08/20/indian-government-state-mafia-media-unsolved-riddle-flood-business/</a></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><b><br />Indian Government, State, Mafia, Media and an unsolved Riddle of the Flood: A Business</b></span><br />
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Half of India today is in the grip of a demon called flood, the biggest disaster that gallops thousands of Indian every year without offering a solution. Some seventy fruitless rainy seasons after independence has passed in the hope of getting a settlement to the unsolved enigma. But, the hope remains a desperate hope for the denizens of flood-affected states, if not area. Thousands of suggestions are offered to define the seriousness of the problems. Geographically, everyone knows what are reasons of the flood, and how these identified. So, the repeated discussions are unnecessary as it would be better to read the NCERT Geography. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Most of the times, the problem called flood has been misunderstood, misapplied, and sometimes even misappropriated by the corporate media houses, that are just helping hand of authority or to say of the powerful. The columns of newspapers are full of the existing difficulties faced by the ordinary people, who sometimes have to pay his/her life and sometimes even family. To give a perpendicular resistance to the flood, the government had done nothing in past, is doing nothing today and also will do nothing in the future, except offering a grant to the state. If one excavates the real truth behind the matter, then in this nothing is “everything.” In fact, the flood is a big business of three-fold dimensions: first Government aids, sand mafia, and exploitation of the natural resources. Except the first, the rest are constitutionally illegal yet profitable and are even un-taxable. Problems of the citizens living in the flood-affected are, if scrutinized, are the business for others. Let us expose the truth behind the perennial flood, one by one.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">I will begin my orientation with sand mining or mafia and not by the government fund. Approved by the geographical society of India, the rivers are a harbinger of the flood and the media focussed only on this half statement. But, they also said that it brings uncounted tons of sand with them, and this remaining half statement is left unsaid. If the Geography department is right then this sand is illegally mined by the mafias in the distinct states. The muscle power behind them is so strong that the common man, officers and even the bureaucrats afraid of taking a strict action against them. Everything is done with the help of <i>Bahubalis</i> that are now part of political systems—I will not go deep in this question and advise the readers to go and watch the movie <i>Gangs of Wasseypur</i>. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">To answer the question, “Why there is illegal sand mining,” I would say, India is transforming into a concrete city which is nearly impossible without sand that is unofficially in the hands of the mafia. If government blocked the flood water, then there will be no sand which means the end of the illegal business which also become a hurdle in the progress of our country. In other words, for the profit, the mafia only are sacrificing the lives of thousands, if not the millions. Saying in simple words, the mafia becomes active after the flood to share the profit out of trillions of the tone of sands that the river brought with it. The media coverage of famous cities and the problems faced by the citizens are nothing but the distraction from the main point of the mafia and illegal mining. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">The second</span><span style="line-height: 115%;"> reason is that most of the flood prone areas are protected areas that are situated around the national reserves, biosphere, national parks, and sanctuary and so on. These areas are protected for the wild-life, birds, and animals such as tigers, rhinos, deer, and some nearly extinct or endangered spices. The government too want it clear to save these animals that are on the verge of extinct. Hence, the flood is used as an invisible weapon and people considered it their fate, not propaganda against them. If the fear of flood is eliminated, then it would invite the population growth that inevitably will demand rights, a school for education, employments and so one. If such happens then, the government and the private corporate sectors will exploit fewer natural resources from these reserves due to the pressure of population density. In one line, if the population rapidly grows, the natural resources would automatically be less as they would be destroyed by the population to secure their daily needs.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">To elaborate the above two points, the corruption and Mafia are the subjects of <i>Gangs of Wasseypur</i>. If the movie has one percent truth, then it would be difficult to deny the existence of illegal mafia and mining as well. The violence shown in the film would become “related to real-life problems” which needed concern, a big concern. The government would do nothing because there are so many <i>bahubalis</i> who also get their share, small or big does not matter. Even if someone complains, then the accused is left after paying some bribe. It is the way black money is made under the nose of government, or to say, with the help of government. The reason is socio-political as well as moral corruption which is due to lack of education—who knows which type of education I am talking. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">There comes the first option of Governmental Aid in the form of funds. One could question whether or not the government too is corrupt, in a moral sense only. After the flood hits, the central governments allocated funds to the disaster prone area. Regarding the funds, one of India’s former Prime Minister said that only one out of ten rupees reached to the masses. If there is the truth, then the fund too is also divided among the corrupts (I think you know better). If the state government with this fund make a bridge or a small stream that flows in a different direction, it will cost around one governmental aid, if necessary then two. But from last seventy years, the state governments and its officers are misusing this support. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">These three factors altogether are synonymous with each other for the flood. The business of flood is more a profit and less a disaster. The central government needs resources which a state reserve, hence it never questions. The state governments need extra funds, so it is going to do nothing except demanding more money to meet the needs of the people. Mafia is doing illegal business that is why media is misguiding only by showing the area around a big city. In addition to this Media mount pressure on the central government by showing the picture of city-related disaster. It criticised state government for not improving the flood-related condition and even the relief to the people. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">This business is like “dodo bird verdict” from a Victorian book <i>Alice in Wonderland</i> in which all players are “winners, ” and no one is a loser. The central government gives relief funds only to be the owner of reserves which are allocated by the concerned ministry to the private sectors. Mafia gets untaxable income through this business, and the progressive cities get sands for the multi-storied buildings. The state government receives funds, and affected people receive aid in the name of the food, water, and so on. And finally, the media promotes everything, and with it, media gets viewers and advertisement. Flood is not one side, or side but three, or to say many-sided business for all like corporate, media, the government of state and center, leaders, bureaucrats, and even mafia (think in your mind is anyone left).<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">All are victim of the moral crimes, but the biggest fault is Media that is manufacturing the consent of people by spreading the misinformation and by hiding the real information. To be clear, the Indian media is not showing accurate news for its principal aim is to earn money or to do business, which enabled it the title of “corporate media.” I am using a famous line from the novel <i>The Great Gatsby</i> to end it, “one thing is sure, nothing is surer. Meanwhile, in between the time, the rich get richer, and the poor get—children.” I think my readers are confused by the ending. By the quotation, I mean that the government will do nothing to promote the idea of progress in your area.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-38230907602186499282017-07-30T21:56:00.002-07:002017-08-13T06:52:41.810-07:00JNU, Professors and the word “militarization”<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Link: <a href="http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/07/31/jnu-professors-word-militarization/">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/07/31/jnu-professors-word-militarization/</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Now-a-day the most favorite, if not critical, term used by the JNU’s professors-cum-intellectuals is “militarization.” Over repeating and needless emphasizing on it prove its importance for them. Apparently, the talk of JNU’s street is questioning: are the professor’s right or wrong? Let's unlock the enigma whether JNU ever promotes “militarization” or not.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Apart from the walls, one often sees the picture of Che Guevara on the t-shirt of students living on campus. Here, two options are possible, either JNU believes in the militarization of Guevara or considered he was peaceful. It is a waste to find a professor who could prove Guevara as peaceful revolutionary, thus, statement one is right. This university, if I am not wrong, at least has two student wing party bears the name of Bhagat Singh in one way or other, who again do believe in “militarization.” The youth icon Subhas Chandra Bose too celebrated “militarization.” Both these legendary heroes are quite regularly acknowledged by the JNUites, especially under the banner of Left political parties. Apart from the pictures and student parties, “militarized” poster of many events can easily be located on the walls of various schools, hostels, and even the library. If professors, including the students, did not worry about these posters, t-shirts, and celebration by student wing then why this word “military” enters in JNU campus after the announcement of the tank. Were they sleeping at that time? Where were they then?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The above description is applicable only to the left parties as they openly suspect, and rightly too, that Right wing favors “militarization.” Their fear is genuine as the modern Right wing such as Savarkar, like the Leftist icons, promote the same. Meanwhile, saying that Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Guevara too sponsor militarization are peaceful would be an antithesis. Now, it’s difficult to observe whose use of word “militarized” is correct, if compared between Left and Right? I think both are wrong.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Thus, “militarization” was, directly or indirectly, part of JNU culture. My weak and feeble mind suggests me the meaning of militarization as an attempt to get a victory against the powerful. In politics, it is directed against the authority. If one succeeds, then he is revolutionary and if failed anti-national (left is both and right is neither in the JNU). The primary trust behind the overuse of word military, indeed, is to get power in their hands by hook or crook, force or foil, morality or immorality. But, the power cannot be achieved only by a direct fighting. Hence, both wings, Right as well as Left, needed a middle person that is JNU’s student, the common scapegoat.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Whoever be the winner of the battle between the professors (Left) and the VC (Right), but the students of JNU (scapegoat) are a loser and will remain the same. Today, all the professors’ are showing as they are the messiah of peace and pretend to be pro-students by their active participation in protests and hunger strikes, a Gandhian method. Let’s assume this statement is right and leave it for the students to decide.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">After the unexpected and controversial event of Feb 9, the entire political lobby demanded that the students must remain away from the politics. But, they forget to talk about the professor, why they are excluded? I question, are they privileged? Lets leave it this matter too as everyone has their right to register their resistance, if it is according to the Indian Constitution. It is, if I am not wrong, also applicable to the professors, so does to me.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Till now, everything written here is about some hundred students and teachers who are part of a political group in a general and party in particular, left or right does not matter. Both are, undoubtedly, loyal to one another—it reminds about Aristotlean Master-Slave relationship model. But, what these teachers are offering to their students who spend their whole day in the library. This number is about 1000 pure researchers on whose name JNU gets best ranking. The professor shows their reliability towards the political students, and hence the researchers are neglected. Remember, it is the blood, sweat, and handwork of those thousand students on whose name these politically active students and politically inspired professors ripe their career. Ask those library-effected-students how much they are happy with this politically inspired atmosphere. Are not they feeling marginalized as their teachers are busy in politics? How much time do these students get? How fruitful is their research after spending nearly half of their day in the library, Monday to Monday, every day without rest? Holi, Diwali, Eid does not matter. Official holiday, no problem, we will read at room is </span><span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">their thought.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The concept of 9B is a crime against Ph.D. who already spend his/her youth in JNU. Whose fault is this, who will take accountability? It happened only in JNU. An IITian finishes his/her Ph.D. in three years, but five summers are needed in JNU. Well done, responsible professors. Simultaneously, the students get a fellowship for three years, but they finish Ph.Ds in five years. Two years totally wasted, who will fund them? The fight should be for solving these student related issues for which the student wing demands votes. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">I forget to mention, if some decision, which the professors considered wrong, is taken by the VC then they say, it is not written in the Constitution. So the VC should work accordingly. Is the same rules are followed by the professors, in particular for a Ph.D. synopsis? As per the rule, every student has to submit their Ph.D. synopsis within six months after their M.Phil Viva. If it is a rule, is there any data to show how many students presented their synopsis within this timeline. Whose mistake is this? Let’s assume: it is student’s mistake because “authority” is always right—the idea is derived from the Philosopher King of Plato’s The Republic. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Dear professors, just take a survey of those students inside the library with the question, “Are you happy with me?” If they say “Yes,” then you are free to go in the streets politics, but if the response is negative then you are “accountable” to students and not politics. The researchers don’t care whether or not there will be a tank, what they need is your attention. As a footnote, there are un-numbered pictures of Gandhi, in all courts, police-stations, offices, but are these able to insert morals in the people working under the shadow of this legend’s picture. If the answer is wrong, then nothing is going to change in JNU after tank—no one can promote his/her political idea with a symbol, neither left (red), nor right (saffron) not third lobby of Ambedkarite (Blue). </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Returning to the title, the “militarization” is always a part of JNU, and we do it sometimes directly and sometimes indirectly. The celebration of revolutionaries, whatever name one has, is the promotion of militarization. Wearing their T-shirt and posting their poster and distributing their pamphlet is also militarization. Do you forget even Karl Marx too believe in militarization by proffering “dictatorship of proletariat”—it was impossible without blood? Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Guevara, Singh, Bose, Savarkar are its another face but at a different time, place and land. If we are teaching our students these names and their achievements, then we are promoting “militarization” but in light shade. If so, then, why we are opposing the hard militarization that is proposed by the VC in the name of a tank. As I told earlier, it is happening only to gain power in the hands of powerful by using students as the cog in their wheels—both left and right are part of it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Militarization is always bad, whether it is a light form of students and professors or in dark form of authority, the Platonic King is my meaning. Its unfortunate effect forced the Indian Socialists to erase the word “blood” from their manifesto of 1957—suggested by Stalin during his visit to India in 1953. The case of Savarkar too was no different. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">What I get from this transition is:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Propaganda follows the mixing of politics with media. Similarly, the secret wedding of politics, media, and army leads towards censorship. By writing this, I too become the target of “censorship” (I cannot name the unnameable). </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><br /></span> <span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Do I have the honor to break the silence of “Censor? ” please let me know.</span><br />
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-21000417557109783552017-07-30T02:20:00.001-07:002017-07-30T02:20:36.708-07:00Nightmare Theory: Moral Abduction in Bihar<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/07/28/nightmare-theory-moral-abduction-bihar/</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">There is no exact definition of “Nightmare Theory” except the phrase occurred once in the movie, <i>A Beautiful Mind</i> that is based on Sylvia Nasar’s biography about the life of John Nash, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 1994. The theory loosely means a situation when one starts believing, but slowly, in impossible facts. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The artists and writers, including intellectuals, who returned their awards in 2015 as a gift for the vanguard of democracy, have quickly accepted the unacceptable that BJP forms a government in Bihar. The condition of Congress, Lalu, and the masses in Bihar is in the same dilemma. The delusion of “<i>su-shasana</i>” (good governance), as promised by the <i>Mahagathbandan</i> (Grand alliance) is a thing of past now.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The ethics, morality, masses, love, family or to say everything is sacrificed to gain power. In the olden era, the kings massacred their families, and child betrayed their fathers. To say differently, the man in the authority is always right, even if s/he is wrong. The dropping of Nuclear Bomb on Japan killed millions and after-effects were even worse. But, the man, Henry S. Truman, who gave order for such task, good or bad does not matter, is considered great because of power and victory of Alliance in WW-II. On the other hand, Hitler is considered the enemy of humanity as he was a harbinger of death to the million of the Jews. Both killed uncounted, but the power categorized them as “good” or “bad.” What will change in this world or, in India, if Hitler wins and England with America lose the WW-II? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Similarly, what will change in Bihar if BJP wins in 2015 and even after the demolition of <i>Mahagathbandha</i>. Nothing, I suspect. It will remain what it was yesterday, is today and will continue to be the same tomorrow too. One thing is new in Bihar of mid-2017. Earlier the mass in Bihar was abducted by showing the fear that “jag jao Bihar ke logo, warna Gabbar aa jaega” (wake, arise Biharwallah, else villain (BJP) is coming). But now it is in the name of dirty politics, if I am not wrong. Today, after the imposition of nightmare theory, no has answered that how the villain of yesterday become the hero of today. One can just put it in this way: either one dies as a villain as BJP dies in Bihar election, or one has to live until s/he itself become a villain as Lalu for Nitish. An ordinary person ponder on, who is the villain of today out of Lalu and Nitish? To answer them, I do not know about Lalu, but the case of Nitish is amazingly strange. Whatever be the condition, he emerged as a Hero, and not a villain. By hero, I mean the powerful. He wanted to live in the mainstream to taste the fruit of same power that Truman has but Hitler not. He is the slave to power that is why he is villain Gabbar Singh for the intellectuals of India, especially to those who were part of <i>Award Wapsi Movement</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">It is said and rightly too that in politics no one can trust no one. There is a place where the enemy of yesterday will become a friend. To put it in a phrase, it the marriage of snakes and rats (you know what I mean). Such is entirely applicable to Nitish as well as to the BJP. However, the nightmare theory shall apply only to the intellectuals and not to the people of Bihar, who not only know the scenario but also understand everything very well. Leaders will remain leaders and mass will be mass. Game on politics will continue. Leaders are players, and mass is nothing but an audience, a mute spectator. Remember, the mass has to pay the price to watch them playing and come home bare handed after the match, but players earn while playing. Such is the condition of Bihar. Players win, but Bihar loses. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Only</span><span style="line-height: 115%;"> the voters define the popularity and unpopularity of leader and are nothing beyond this assumption in India. Hence, it is easy for the leaders to abduct, in the case of morality only, them due to their lack of political knowledge. They are just pawn at the hands of political leaders, and they ethically kill them in the name of politics and for fun. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">I know some lines are objectionable, so do object it along with the government of Bihar. The “Biggest Critic,” you are welcome.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-20081353903812605922017-07-30T02:17:00.000-07:002017-07-30T02:17:58.384-07:00Statue, University, and the politics of Symbols: The Curious Case of JNU’s Tank<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Link: <a href="http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/07/26/statue-university-politics-symbols-curious-case-jnus-tank/">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/07/26/statue-university-politics-symbols-curious-case-jnus-tank/</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Statue, whether it is of Gandhi, Nehru, Ambedkar, or Patel, has become an integrated part of modern political philosophy. In 2017, this strange theory is substituted by the national flag, anthem, and cow and finally in the form of a military tank in JNU, Delhi. The statues, as the government considered, are a symbol of the historical struggle led by a particular person at a given time. To promote ideas, it sponsors the politics of statue to historicize the forgotten history.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">However, the truth is that the nuclear mass highly neglects these figures after their installation. Everyone forgets the statue with the passage of time. For example, to celebrate the victory of Robert Clive, who wins the Battle of Plassey, the British government established his two statues: first in Shrewsbury and the second in King Charles Street near St James’ Park, London. But, when the later generations were questioned about the statue, they fail to tell, recognise, even to name it. The government, by taking strict actions inscribed Clive’s name below the icon so that the future generations could remember his contributions to the King and the Country.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">In fact, similar is the tale of all statues. They are in a famous location sometime at the center, yet they are the most dislocated phenomena. Such is the story of India’s one of the topmost University, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. This education hub is in the news, less good and more worse, from last twenty months over one reason, “nationalism.” As per the new sources, as circulated in the media, a tank is to be established in the campus. Before going to tank, let’s see how many old legends have their statue in the library of this University.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">In answer, the name of Nehru and Ambedkar will strike the mind. Both of these statues are, saying honestly, are highly neglected by the visitors, including the JNU students. It is even worse in this age where everything is reported to the world in a geo-bragger manner; I mean the mobile-selfie. Hardly one find anyone taking a picture with the statue of Ambedkar. However, if one visits Columbia, then s/he would never forget to pose against Ambedkar. Why Ambedkar of JNU faced discrimination as it failed to attract no audience who will take a picture of it—reason is the promotion of Idea. The difference between Columbia and JNU is the reason. Truly speaking, these statues are unknowingly murdered by the masses with their neglecting. No one pays them homage, neither directly, and nor indirectly.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Amid this, what will be the future of the tank that soon will, what if uncertain, fill the blank space only to inject nationalism in the newcomers. Will it become the centre of attraction or there is any propaganda, I mean Latin Propaganda.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">I will not define each kind of propaganda and focus on only two types: media propaganda and Latin propaganda. In the former, two parties spread a lie, and each tries to show whose lie is less lie than the other. Whereas, the Latin propaganda is a situation when an uncertain future event, mostly fake, is propagated by a celebrity. It was the favourite weapon of Mussolini during the WW-II. The second party takes this fact as true by accepting the idea without much resistance. This type of propaganda is promoted with the help of media so that the opposition, which is less in numbers, can give their views on the event. By giving their ideas, they are, unconsciously, advertising what the celebrity wanted to. Here, they are at spreading first party’s view even without knowing it. Now, the celebrity has to prove that the original message of opposition is wrong. If he remained successful, then the celebrity can easily sponsor its fake news as real news. This half-baked-fake news is nothing but the installation of the tank is JNU.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Which university in the world is decorated with Army tank, even a popular newspaper noted only one event of such type in South Asia after 1945. The opposition is so unconscious that they promote it without knowing the fact. What circular is passed to install a tank—it is just an idea, given by a celebrity, which makes it nearer to the Latin propaganda. If the criticism of this un-futuristic event continues in the same manner, then far is not the day when the tank in JNU will be a reality. In fact, no one, including the Vice-Chancellor, wants a tank, but promotion and criticism of Tank surely make it possible.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">If the tank comes, then I assure you, dear reader, you, me, and the visitors who come to JNU will always take a selfie. It is the same type of historicization with which the statue of Nehru and Ambedkar are promoted on the campus.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The only solution to this tank is not in criticism but in “not to talk or give one’s view about it.” If it happened, then like the case of Clive, the influential people have to make another plan to promote their idea. The memory of masses is so weak that they forget everything after some time. But advertisement and promotion, again and again, remind them of the tank. Sometimes, silence is the best method to protect one. Sometimes, it is better to run away rather than to fight with the enemy. I prefer to run away. Choose your option, criticise the tank or leave it to time to decide what it wraps in its lap.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; display: inline; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Wait, is am I promoting propaganda?</span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2276009002109051141.post-31340879602236346192017-07-30T02:12:00.003-07:002017-07-30T02:14:16.585-07:00The Election of President<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Link: <a href="http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/07/20/election-president-journey-west-north/">http://indiaheadlines.in/en/2017/07/20/election-president-journey-west-north/</a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The issues like the cow, Hindu, Muslim, beef, triple talaq, dalits are at its height in the year 2017. Amid the above unintentional news, India, by showing the power of democracy, has elected it second dalit president- You know the name very well (censorship in media forced me to not to mention the name, so assume it). The mainstream media reports including the news broadcasts of this auspicious event, those are excluded who disagree with the word auspicious, forced me to write this.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The winter was about to pass when Donald Trump, the mad man of America as reported by media, became or to say become, the president of USA. The liberal media, let us assume it liberal at least in the meaning of the word, houses out of the USA, who were against Trump, testify that America will never give a woman any chance to be a president. I am leaving it to your judgment to consider the case of International media in the court of humanity, but I am untouched by the question of that corporate media.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Let us take a U-Turn towards India.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">In all the news, views, and reviews of Indian election, the question of women is out, or to say correctly, substituted by the word "Dalit." (is there any press, national or international, that said a "woman lost in India" (I repeat only woman, not dalit). Clearly, it is a significant defeat of feminism when women are projected not as women but identified by its caste, class or religion.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">A woman of any country does not belong to any class, caste or race including ethnicity as she was exploited even by the most exploited section. Whether it is Jews, Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Black, Dalit or any other most subaltern, everyone was/were cruel towards their women, forcing them to stay behind the closed doors. The condition is so worse that even in the Buddhist dominated countries of Asia are not spread by this virus of the older traditions.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">What the answer out of this presidential election comes out is about dalit and not about women. If we look at any data, women in India are roughly fifty percent but what is their percentage in Parliament? What about the reservation Bill that previously passed by Rajya Sabha? Why media is saying "dalit president" (whether male or female) by avoiding the most fundamental question of "women"- Remember the data that is fifty percent.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">A powerful woman, I think, is more manly than the man. For example, Mayawati, Sonia, Mamta, and others are not women but man due to the power behind them. The meaning of man cannot be defined by the biological strength or any other manliness that one has towards man (macho man, Superman, Heman, so on). In fact, all words say one thing, man is "the man" because of "power." If this power is transferred to women, then they too can be a man (you are free to call it Platonic Cave, Madman's Imagination, Ivory Oriental outlook).</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">The above argument is for those who have power or have thrust upon power. But, what about those who are powerless? Another open end left for you to complete (what is there for my mother, sister, daughter, wife-- again I left a point to critique, why man what a mother, sister and so on).</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Moving forwards, Loss of woman as a president is not a loss of a dalit woman, who by her power is not a dalit at all, but a loss of women, who despite her power failed to reserve a high post of office.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">In fact, she lost not because she was a dalit it is because there were fewer females in Parliament. If the woman is powerless, then she needs a tag like dalit, but when she is powerful, she becomes a man.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Giving her same seats in parliament could, not sure, make her a man. And if she becomes man, then there will be a fight between man versus man. The question of man versus tag will automatically be eliminated. This man versus man theory is highly successful in Panchayat Election.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Today's women are in need no tag but of power that makes her equal to man. She is not designed for the proverb, "Behind every successful man, there is a woman." If she can "behind" why not "together" or even "forward."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;">Yes, in the final word, a man can be dalit because he was exploited, but a woman cannot because she was exploited even by a Dalit. The woman is only "woman," who has no identity and is classless, colorless, casteless, nameless, or even non-religious entity.</span></div>
</div>
Kashyap Deepakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05724719354478570994noreply@blogger.com0